- Type:#article
- Year read:#read2021
- Subject: Open Science
- Bibtex: @soderberg2021
- Bibliography: Soderberg, C.K., Errington, T.M., Schiavone, S.R. et al. Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model. Nat Hum Behav 5, 990–997 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01142-4
Why and when I was reading this
It’s about registered reports and I am interested in various open science topics
Key takeaways
- Blinded reviewers reviewed the scientific quality or registered reports versus comparison papers
- RRs were rated as having better methodological rigour and higher quality
